🔗 Share this article

Brigitte Macron's daughter, her daughter, testified to a Paris court that inaccurate assertions circulating on the internet—among them the baseless theory that she was born a man—have significantly harmed her mother's personal well-being.

Auzière, a legal professional, was called as a testifier in the trial of 10 individuals allegedly involved in internet-based abuse against the first lady.

Effects on Daily Life

Auzière testified that the first lady now is always concerned about how she looks, including her attire to how she stands, because of the apprehension that any image may be distorted to support hateful attacks.

"The consequence is that she always has to pay attention to what she wears, her posture, no matter what she's doing in everyday routine," she testified.

Defendants and Accusations

Ten individuals, in that age range, are in court for digital abuse. A few had modest digital reach, while several more were better known.

Every defendant is accused of spreading defamatory content about the first lady's personal life. In certain cases, this extended to comparing the age gap with her husband to inappropriate terms.

If found responsible, they may be sentenced to up to two years in jail.

Consequences for Loved Ones

She, a daughter from Brigitte Macron's previous marriage, described how the baseless rumors have caused a "decline of her well-being" and a "decline of her overall existence".

She said, "Scarcely a day goes by when a person does not talk the issue to her."

She highlighted the repercussions on the family, for example the kids learning about hurtful comments like "Your grandmother is lying" or "Your grandmother is actually a man".

"She is unsure how to stop it," she stated. "She holds no office, she has not sought anything, and she is constantly experiencing this abuse."

Legal Battle Background

The legal proceedings represents a recent development in a broader legal battle against the inaccurate allegation that she is supposedly male.

The Macrons have pursued a case in America alleging slander targeting a media personality who amplified the theory.

The lawsuit clarifies that the allegation is totally unfounded and points out that the person cited is in fact her older brother.

Defendants' Responses

Throughout the proceedings, some of the accused rejected the charges.

• One defendant, serving as a local official, stated he "had no purpose to inflict damage" and described his online statements as ironic.
• A fiction writer claimed that his social media shares were meant to be "irony" and highlighted apprehension that the legal action could threaten "the right to speak freely".
• Another individual said he disseminated content as he believed it was a global issue with "implications for the country".

Personal History

The false theory regarding the first lady's gender circulated partly because their marriage has frequently been a subject of discussion on the internet.

The first lady, aged two decades older than her husband, first met the future president when serving as a teacher at his secondary school.

Their bond grew through the school's theatre programme, and they wed in the following year, following her divorce.

She finished her statement by expressing that the false claims have produced a "whirlwind that continues endlessly" for the first lady.